Screener
XCEM vs INCO
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs Columbia India Consumer ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.59% less per year.
- XCEM is significantly larger than INCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | INCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $232M |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | -9.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 16.61% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -47.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and INCO
Explore further