Screener
XCEM vs SPEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.09% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than XCEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $17.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and SPEM
Explore further