Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XCEM vs XCNY

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

XCEM

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.16%

Fund size

$1.7B

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • XCEM is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XCEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XCEMXCNY
Annual cost (TER)0.16%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$9M
Since20152024
Dividend yield2.71%2.41%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+67.6%+36.3%
CAGR 3Y+26.6%N/A
CAGR 5Y+12.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.23N/A
Volatility 1Y20.78%16.58%
Max drawdown-40.92%-19.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XCEM and XCNY