Screener
XCHG vs IMCV
Ab US Equity ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IMCV costs 0.44% less per year.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; IMCV uses index tracking.
- IMCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.83% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -46.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and IMCV
Explore further