Screener
XCHG vs ILCV
Ab US Equity ETF vs iShares Morningstar Value ETF
Key differences
- ILCV costs 0.46% less per year.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; ILCV uses index tracking.
- ILCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.94% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -35.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and ILCV
Explore further