Screener
XCHG vs IWL
Ab US Equity ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.35% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than XCHG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and IWL
Explore further