Screener
XCHG vs IWR
Ab US Equity ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.32% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than XCHG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $52.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and IWR
Explore further