Screener
XCLR vs MILN
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Key differences
- XCLR costs 0.25% less per year.
- MILN is significantly larger than XCLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCLR is classified as alternative, while MILN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XCLR follows a option income strategy; MILN uses index tracking.
- MILN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCLR | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $99M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 0.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -46.74% | -44.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCLR and MILN
Explore further