Screener
XCNY vs EMTL
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- EMTL is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCNY is classified as equity, while EMTL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EMTL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $90M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and EMTL
Explore further