Screener
XCNY vs GMF
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both XCNY and GMF are equity ETFs. XCNY charges 0.19% a year and GMF 0.49%. The main difference: XCNY costs 0.30% less per year.
- XCNY costs 0.30% less per year.
- GMF is much larger than XCNY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $406M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.22% | 17.01% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -40.18% |
Similar to XCNY and GMF
Explore further