Screener
XCNY vs SAMT
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.47% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCNY is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XCNY follows a index tracking strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $619M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.3% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and SAMT
Explore further