Screener
XCOR vs KAT
Fundx ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.40% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than XCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCOR | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180M | $688M |
| Since | 2001 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.85% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCOR and KAT
Explore further