Screener
XCOR vs XNAV
Fundx ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XCOR costs 0.12% less per year.
- XCOR is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCOR is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCOR | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180M | $31M |
| Since | 2001 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.85% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCOR and XNAV
Explore further