Screener
XNAV vs XRLX
FundX Aggressive ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.07% less per year.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $51M |
| Since | 2002 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and XRLX
Explore further