Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XDQQ vs FFTY

Innovator ETFs Trust vs CapForce IBD 50 ETF

XDQQ

Innovator ETFs Trust

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$54M

FFTY

CapForce IBD 50 ETF

Capital-FORCE ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$88M

Key differences

  • XDQQ is classified as alternative, while FFTY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • XDQQ follows a structured outcome strategy; FFTY uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, FFTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XDQQFFTY
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.80%
Fund size (AUM)$54M$88M
Since20212015
Dividend yield0.00%1.23%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.7%+38.1%
CAGR 3Y+19.3%+21.2%
CAGR 5Y+9.1%-1.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.890.68
Volatility 1Y13.87%34.00%
Max drawdown-35.63%-59.46%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XDQQ and FFTY