Screener
XEML vs EASG
Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- EASG costs 0.21% less per year.
- EASG is significantly larger than XEML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EASG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XEML | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $67M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -13.49% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XEML and EASG
Explore further