Screener
XFLX vs EMBD
FundX Flexible ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.58% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $256M |
| Since | 2002 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 9.73% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.53% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XFLX and EMBD
Explore further