Screener
EMBD vs XNAV
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.88% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD is classified as fixed income, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $31M |
| Since | 2020 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.8% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and XNAV
Explore further