Screener
XFLX vs KONG
FundX Flexible ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
XFLX is a fixed income ETF, while KONG is an alternative ETF. XFLX charges 0.97% a year and KONG 0.89%.
- XFLX is a fixed income fund, while KONG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- KONG costs 0.08% less per year.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $22M |
| Since | 2002 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 9.67% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.57% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -19.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.