Screener
XFLX vs YJUN
FundX Flexible ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
Key differences
- YJUN costs 0.07% less per year.
- XFLX is classified as fixed income, while YJUN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX follows a active selection strategy; YJUN uses structured outcome.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | YJUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $131M |
| Since | 2002 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 9.73% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | 6.88% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -21.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XFLX and YJUN
Explore further