Screener
YJUN vs XNAV
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- YJUN costs 0.37% less per year.
- YJUN is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YJUN | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.88% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -21.53% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YJUN and XNAV
Explore further