Screener
XIDV vs GEND
Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- XIDV costs 0.19% less per year.
- XIDV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XIDV is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XIDV covers global markets; GEND covers north america.
- XIDV follows a index tracking strategy; GEND uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| XIDV | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $4M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.30% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.28% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -12.15% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XIDV and GEND
Explore further