Screener
XLCI vs RSPC
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
Key differences
- XLCI costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPC is significantly larger than XLCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLCI is classified as alternative, while RSPC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XLCI follows a option income strategy; RSPC uses index tracking.
- RSPC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLCI | RSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $64M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -7.72% | -38.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLCI and RSPC
Explore further