Skip to content
Screener

XLF vs ROKT

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

XLF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Annual cost

0.08%

Fund size

$49.4B

ROKT

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$255M

Key differences

Both XLF and ROKT are equity ETFs. XLF charges 0.08% a year and ROKT 0.45%. The main difference: XLF covers North America; ROKT covers global markets.

  • XLF covers North America; ROKT covers global markets.
  • XLF costs 0.37% less per year.
  • XLF is much larger than ROKT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ROKT has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XLFROKT
Annual cost (TER)0.08%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$49.4B$255M
Since19982018
Dividend yield1.54%0.25%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+4.2%+102.2%
CAGR 3Y+19.3%+44.3%
CAGR 5Y+8.2%+24.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.961.49
Volatility 1Y14.64%29.83%
Max drawdown-42.86%-43.16%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to XLF and ROKT