Screener
XLG vs RWK
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- XLG costs 0.19% less per year.
- XLG is significantly larger than RWK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLG | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | 16.84% |
| Max drawdown | -30.46% | -46.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLG and RWK
Explore further