Screener
XLG vs SPXN
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.11% less per year.
- XLG is significantly larger than SPXN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLG | SPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $74M |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.2% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.46% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -30.46% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLG and SPXN
Explore further