Screener
XLV vs BBH
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
Both XLV and BBH are equity ETFs. XLV charges 0.08% a year and BBH 0.35%. The main difference: XLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLV is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLV | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38.2B | $367M |
| Since | 1998 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -39.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.