Skip to content
Screener

XMAR vs XDEC

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

XMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$130M

XDEC

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$175M

Key differences

Both XMAR and XDEC are alternative ETFs. XMAR charges 0.85% a year and XDEC 0.85%. The main difference: Over the last three years, XMAR has delivered higher annualized returns.

  • Over the last three years, XMAR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XMARXDEC
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$130M$175M
Since20232021
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+12.3%+11.4%
CAGR 3Y+11.0%+9.8%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.260.91
Volatility 1Y3.07%4.79%
Max drawdown-7.29%-11.75%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to XMAR and XDEC