Screener
XME vs COPX
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs Global X Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.30% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | COPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $7.4B |
| Since | 2006 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.9% | +113.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.0% | +17.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.18% | 40.77% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -65.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and COPX
Explore further