Screener
XME vs RSPM
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.05% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than RSPM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | RSPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $179M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.0% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.18% | 18.20% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -39.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and RSPM
Explore further