Screener
XME vs SGDM
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.11% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XME follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $660M |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +106.2% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.7% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.5% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.35% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and SGDM
Explore further