Screener
XME vs METL
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.64% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XME follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $95M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +106.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and METL
Explore further