Screener
XMHQ vs FSCS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
Key differences
Both XMHQ and FSCS are equity ETFs. XMHQ charges 0.25% a year and FSCS 0.60%. The main difference: XMHQ costs 0.35% less per year.
- XMHQ costs 0.35% less per year.
- XMHQ is much larger than FSCS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XMHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | FSCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $56M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +2.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -43.57% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.