Screener
XMHQ vs GQQQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ costs 0.10% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than GQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMHQ follows a index tracking strategy; GQQQ uses active selection.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | GQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $130M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.0% | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 15.78% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -22.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and GQQQ
Explore further