Screener
XMHQ vs IDHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ is significantly larger than IDHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMHQ covers north america markets; IDHQ covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IDHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $741M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and IDHQ
Explore further