Screener
XMHQ vs QGRO
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ follows a index tracking strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $2.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and QGRO
Explore further