Screener
XMLV vs GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, GRPM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $482M |
| Since | 2013 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 0.98% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 16.33% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -43.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and GRPM
Explore further