Screener
XMLV vs ILOW
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.25% less per year.
- XMLV follows a index tracking strategy; ILOW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | ILOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -10.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and ILOW
Explore further