Screener
XMLV vs VO
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VO costs 0.22% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $213.8B |
| Since | 2013 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 12.42% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -39.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and VO
Explore further