Screener
XMLV vs KAUG
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.54% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMLV is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XMLV follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- XMLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $80M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and KAUG
Explore further