Screener
XMLV vs OMFL
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMLV is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XMLV follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.3% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.33% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and OMFL
Explore further