Screener
XNAV vs EAOA
FundX Aggressive ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOA costs 1.09% less per year.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while EAOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $36M |
| Since | 2002 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | 10.80% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -25.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and EAOA
Explore further