Screener
XNAV vs FDEV
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FDEV costs 1.09% less per year.
- FDEV is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while FDEV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FDEV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FDEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $271M |
| Since | 2002 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 11.93% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -30.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and FDEV
Explore further