Screener
XNAV vs KAT
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.52% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $688M |
| Since | 2002 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and KAT
Explore further