Screener
XNAV vs MATE
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and MATE are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- MATE costs 0.30% less per year.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $39M |
| Since | 2002 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.