Screener
XNAV vs RYLG
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and RYLG are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and RYLG 0.35%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- RYLG costs 0.92% less per year.
- XNAV is much larger than RYLG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $8M |
| Since | 2002 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 7.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 15.11% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -22.37% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.