Screener
XNAV vs TUGN
FundX Aggressive ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and TUGN are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and TUGN 0.65%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- TUGN costs 0.62% less per year.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $78M |
| Since | 2002 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 10.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | +31.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 16.24% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -23.45% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.