Screener
XNAV vs CCOR
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and CCOR are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $27M |
| Since | 2002 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.