Screener
XPND vs FSGS
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- XPND follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XPND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XPND | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $29M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.9% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.70% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -38.00% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XPND and FSGS
Explore further