Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XPP vs EPV

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

EPV

ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$14M

Key differences

  • XPP is classified as cryptocurrency, while EPV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • XPP follows a leveraged strategy; EPV uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XPPEPV
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$14M
Since20092009
Dividend yield2.43%4.69%
Asset classcryptocurrencyequity
Regioneurope
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y-8.4%-30.7%
CAGR 3Y+5.4%-24.4%
CAGR 5Y-19.1%-19.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.31-0.85
Volatility 1Y38.82%31.30%
Max drawdown-89.90%-93.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XPP and EPV